diziler la revolution diziler the boys

This film forever engraved the director's name in the list of outstanding artists20th century worldcinematography In front of it, F. F. Coppola, U.Friedkin, S. Lumet and others.Thematic update by Gollywood was conditioned by the need forchanging the hero. Yes, inthe second half of the 60s -in the first half of the 70s appear on the screen like thiscalled antiheroes. Unlikelegendary x handsome men, "knights without fear"reproach" of the 30s,new heroes havecertainhuman weaknesses, but under any conditions they do not lose their sense of self-worth. Such imagesembodied by outstanding actors, known to the whole world as the brilliant Hollywood four - D. Hoffman,R. De Niro, J. Nicholson, Al Pacino.Al Pacino, outstandingAmerican and actorof Italian origin, pupil of the Higherschool of performing arts of TV, organically combines work in the theater in its activitiesand cinema.However, the worldwide fame of Al Pacinoidentified with cinema.

Yuriy Shevchuk, founder and director of the Ukrainian Film Club of Columbia University, in his article " Language in the Modern Cinema of Ukraine", described this phenomenon as follows: "Ukrainian film aphorisms were included in the Russian collection "Flying Phrases and Aphorisms of the National Cinema" entirely according to the logic of colonialism, becoming a fact of imperial culture . Thus, a change in language causes a change in the national identity of a cultural product. Ukrainian film aphorisms, like entire films translated into Russian, ceased to belong to the people who created them, and became Russian not only for Russians, but also in the minds of Ukrainians themselves."

The cinema of independent Ukraine becomes the object of research by I. Zubavina. It must be said that the author set himself a difficult task: the material, one might say, is still pulsating, having "not stood up" in numerous studies. But the author decently overcomes these difficulties, singling out the most noticeable and expressive tendencies manifested in film productions created at domestic studios. I. Zubavina observes how the breath of time changes the aesthetics of national cinema, how painfully these changes sometimes occur, but the author does not doubt their regularity and necessity.